Now That’s the Making of a Great Coach

Navy Football
10x Marketing asked:


Now That’s The Making of A Great Coach

Matt Fankhauser

Is athletic coaching and leadership coaching in the business world the same thing? It is this writer’s opinion that we can equate the value of team coaching to just about any corporate team. The role of a great leader is to be a great coach, change agent, and motivator. Many lessons parallel in both the business world and amateur and professional sports world. For example, tracking and measuring the results of the influence of a coach is when the time runs out, there is always a score to indicate whether the coaching and learning’s are transferring to results.

Many successful coaches have been noted in the sports world. John Wooden, a legend of the NCAA Basketball world, won ten National Championships during his reign at UCLA. Phil Jackson helped the Chicago Bulls to five NBA Championships and then led the Los Angeles Lakers to three. Bill Belichick led the New England Patriots to three NFL Super Bowl victories in four years, an uncommon feat in today’s world of professional sports. The common thread among these coaches was the ability to not only win one championship, but several championships, and all within a close time frame. If these coaches were not winning championships, they were consistently near the top of their respective professions. Great coaches are able to not only obtain great performance and results with their team, but to also sustain results and high performance over time.

So the question now is how do these coaches achieve better performance than the others? What traits and characteristics can we benchmark and take away from the sports world and apply to leadership coaching in business? Let’s take a closer look at one of the fore mentioned coaches, Bill Belichick of the New England Patriots. What made him the coach he is today? There are 3 specific areas that set him apart from the ordinary:

1. He emulated and developed a leadership coaching style from other great mentors and coaches.

2. He selected team players to fit his strategy and concept of a team.

3. He surrounded himself with the effective supporting coaches.

1. Bill Belichick’s first model was his father, Steve Belichick a very much respected football coach. He was a “lifer” spending most of his career at Navy, where he coached football for 33 years. Steve was viewed by his peers as a coach’s coach and was considered an original teacher of the game. It was said that he had no equal in preparing his players for a game. Steve was completely dedicated to his craft and he passed on a relentless work ethic his son. Steve taught his son Bill that football “…was not just a game, it was a profession….something to be proud of.”

Bill Belichick also had the advantage to be mentored by another successful coach, Steve Sarota, his high school coach. Sarota coached for over 41 years at Andover, Maryland. When the attitudes of young players in the 1960’s demanded a change in the game of football, Sarota hardly changed at all. It was a time when young men and women questioned authority and no longer automatically obeyed the rules of the coach or the dean. This meant that a style of influence skills would need to be different, but for Sarota this was easy. A formidable authority figure, he coached by persuasion, not orders and yelling. He would always explain to his players, in a calm voice, what they needed to do in a given game, and which part of their mission he expected them to execute on. Sarota taught with great skill, which had an exemplary effect on the young men in his program. Sarato could reach into the deepest part of a player and help develop character. He taught that excellence was valued, mistakes would be made, even expected, and the game was always fun. His expectations of players were simple, be in good shape and to listen to the coaches. He never belittled his players and never had to discipline. The rules were set, they were clear, and no one fooled around on Sarota’s time. None of this escaped Bill Belichick.

2. Bill Belichick clearly understands the concept of teamwork. Many people are impressed that Bill stays focused on this concept, even when outside forces consistently work against it. In football there may be as many as 40 players that play important roles in any given victory, although the media might only celebrate one or two individuals. It is easy to see how this team building can be damaged by pre-game hype and interviews by the media highlight the stars, instead of the team collectively. Coach Belichick keeps his players focused on the whole. As was evident when New England took the field in its first Super Bowl. Each player is typically introduced one by one. Belichick instead told the league officials his team would be introduced as a team, all at once, with confidence. But in a sport where individual egos are constantly fed, finding “team” players can be a real challenge.

3. Bill Belichick also understands that one man cannot do it all. If he were to make the team great he needed find good talent. Bill spends a great deal of time and energy in choosing and selecting the right players. When Bill played football at Andover, he became associated with another player, Ernie Adams. The two had been intrigued with football at an early age. In high school, they called themselves football nerds and the connection among them was immediate and lasting. Adams became a highly talented scout and master of film evaluation. After 30 years of coaching, Belichick and Adams finally found themselves coaching in the biggest game of their lives, the Super Bowl and considered the major underdog. But they had done their preparation and coaching, their team won. At the end of the game, Ron Jaworski, a retired NFL star player was quoted as saying, “Belichick is the best in the game today, maybe the best ever.”

We can learn from Bill Belichick and the world of sports by applying a few simple leadership coaching elements to the business world.

1. Look for good coaches and learn from them. By making ourselves better coaches today, we will also be patterning a way for the future leaders and coaches of our organizations.

2. Be sure to be focused on the team concept, not on star rewards. We need to be able to coach each team member to be his or her best, keeping his/her focus on the need of teamwork as a whole.

3. Surround yourself with people that can and will assist and support your efforts as the leader, who will provide the right coaching at all levels in the organization.

Amazing results can be obtained in any organization if coaches remember these three simple thoughts.



The History of the T-shirt


Matthew S Stewart asked:


The history of the T-shirt is replete with origin myths. In one sense, T-shirts — lightweight undergarments designed to be worn in hot or extremely temperate conditions — have been around for thousands of years. Archaeological evidence suggests that laborers in ancient Egypt wore a kind of “T-shirt,” and anthropologists and clothing historians can point to many similar garments throughout history.

Last Century

The modern incarnation of the T-shirt originated sometime between the late-19th and mid-20th century. Some Anglophiles remain convinced that the English were the first to design the T-shirt in around 1880. In any case, by the turn of the century, many clothiers in Europe had picked up on the trend.

United States citizens first became aware of the existence of “light cotton undergarments” during World War I, after American soldiers saw their European counterparts wearing them. Members of the US Navy at that time were required to wear heavy wool uniforms, which were incredibly uncomfortable during the hot European summers.

The US Navy’s claim that it introduced the first T-shirt to America in 1913 is not unchallenged. Many believe that a man named Howard Jones engineered the first “true T-Shirt,” an absorbent athletic garment designed for athletes on the University of Southern California football squad.

The moviegoing public was stunned in 1934 when Clark Gable appeared in the Oscar winning film, It Happened One Night, wearing his slacks with just a T-shirt. With Claudette Colbert in the same motel room, albeit behind a flimsy hanging-sheet “wall,” it was too much for some moralizers, who quickly instituted censorship via a movie rating “commission.”

In World War II, the T-shirt soared to new heights of popularity. Somewhat ironically, photos of American soldiers doing labor in T-shirts glamorized the garments. Shortly after the war ended, in 1948, presidential challenger Thomas Dewey used a massive T-shirt campaign to advocate for his candidacy. Four years later, general Dwight D. Eisenhower also employed a T-shirt campaign (“I like Ike!”) to generate interest. Around this time, American icons like James Dean, John Wayne and Marlon Brando “shockingly” wore T-shirts both in public and in their TV and film appearances. These cultural moments paved the way for a broad new popular appreciation of the T-shirt.

Modern History

In the 1960s and 1970s, the counterculture movement claimed the T-shirt as a symbol of its rebellion. So-called “tie dyed” T-shirts became the rage; screen printing and other home design techniques also empowered people to tailor their own T-Shirt messages. Professional designers expanded the form as well, offering alternative cuts and styles, such as the scoop neck, tank top, and V-neck.

By the 1980s, the T-shirt had solidified its place as a defining garment of a generation. Counterculture figures galore embraced the T-shirt and made it a staple of the American wardrobe. Rock bands, political activists, and other iconic figures of the Vietnam and Woodstock generation all helped cement the T-shirt’s cultural position in the pantheon of native dress.

In the 1990s, the T-shirt evolved further as a social phenomenon. So-called “joke T-shirts” became prominent. Many such shirts included bawdy jokes, lewd plays on words, and the like. At the same time, top-tier designers were reinventing the form as a luxury garment.

By the turn of the 21st century, designers like Diesel and Versace were selling ultra high-end T-shirts for hundreds of dollars. What’s more, during the first decade of the 21st century, we have seen an increasing trend towards proliferation of independent labels. Thus, the T-shirt marketplace has become more variegated than ever. Traditional T-shirt manufacturers, like Jockey, Heinz, and Calvin Klein, continue to produce millions of standard undergarments every year. Simultaneously, medium and high-end designers evolve their own takes on the concept.

Where did the actual word “T-shirt” come from? The answer to this riddle is a matter of debate. Conventional wisdom suggests that the name comes from the shape of the shirt on the body. However, some believe that “T” in “T-shirt” comes from the last syllable of the word “amputee.” The idea behind this theory is that T-shirts with short sleeves resemble the bodies of amputees. Finally, some believe that the “T” is short for “training.” Given the military origins of the garment, there is some at least anecdotal support for this idea.

Future of the T-shirt

How the T-shirt concept will evolve in the future is anyone’s guess. One trend which many marketers point to is America’s increasing desire for “mass customization.” Society demands more and more mass-produced commodities — like T-shirts — but our increasingly individualistic culture simultaneously urges us towards customization. Thus, suggest many designers, the T-shirts of the future may be mass-produced yet made to order. We’ll continue to see the full range of T-shirts currently on the market, but we will also see an increasing number of both professionally customized and clever, “home branded” garments.



Reality Sports

Navy Football
Nick Laurrell asked:


START

I do not understand where the UIGEA came from.

I get that it is supposed to curb illegal youth gaming (because World of Warcraft is so much better for a 17 year old than poker is.) I get that it is supposed to curb money laundering (because there is obviously nothing illegal going on with the Oil, Coffee and Corn Markets.) I even get that it was supposed to help other gaming industries (because if you play poker online than you obviously would never go to Vegas again.)

But for the life of me, I don’t get where it came from.

It seems too stupid to be true – too transparently skewed to be a real piece of legislation. After all, we’re still arguing about just what the UIGEA covers: poker is bad, but inexplicably, horse racing and fantasy sports are fine. And I’m far from the first person to be interested in the origins of the UIGEA. In fact, journalist Ed Brayton requested formal transcripts of a number of the meetings that led up to the writing of the UIGEA, but he was turned down by the US Government because, and I quote:

Please be advised that the document you seek is being withheld in full pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(1), which pertains to information that is properly classified in the interest of national security pursuant to Executive Order 12958.

So we can’t hear the official version of the UIGEA’s birth because it is a matter of national security.

Instead, why don’t we take a look at the two major exceptions to the UIGEA – horse racing and fantasy sports – let’s take a look [m1] at those that the UIGEA accepts.

Horse Racing:

A lot has been written on the connection between the UIGEA and the horse racing industry, so I’ll be brief – horse racing is OK because the industry bought off a number of politicians. This is a quote from the lobbyist group American Horse Council, itself:

“The provisions protecting horseracing were included in the [UIGEA] package through the support of Senators Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Jim Bunning (R-KY), John Kyl (R-AZ) and Representatives Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), Mike Oxley (R-OH) and Jim Leach (R-IA),”

That support came on the heels of more than $3 million in donations made to politicians on Capitol Hill.

So it’s far from a mystery as to why horse racing was protected. But the next exception is a little less, shall we say, epistemological in nature.

Fantasy Sports

For people who don’t play fantasy sports, here is how it works. Players draft athletes (NFL players, NBA players, etc, etc.) and go up against other players in their league. The games are decided by counting up the chosen statistics for each team (Touchdowns, receptions, points scored, batting average, etc., etc.) So the more positive statistics each athlete gains in their real game, the more positive statistics the fantasy sports player gains in their fantasy game. Players put money in at the beginning of the season, then, at the end of the season, the winners of each league collect the brunt that money pool as their prize (you have to pay league fees and whatnot, so no one collects all of the money put into the pool by players.) Remember, this is not gambling according to the UIGEA/ US Government.

To give you an idea of how big fantasy sports have become, here are some numbers.

In 2005, the year before the UIGEA came out, 12.6 million people played at least one full season of fantasy sports in the US.

Of those 12.6 million, 92% were male (leaving a healthy one million female players) and 77% were married.

91% of players were Caucasian and 86% owned their own home.

59% made more than $50,000 annually and each player spent an average of $493.60 on Fantasy Sports that year to represent a $4 Billion Industry.

And maybe the most important number, 85% of Fantasy Sports players played fantasy football.

So people who play fantasy sports are generally white, generally wealthy and generally into football.

Ah, the NFL – the biggest sports league in America. From the unquantifiable monetary influx that the Super Bowl represents every year to the only year round single-sport show on ESPN (NFL Live) the NFL is king in the USA – and fantasy sports is no exception.

When it comes to fantasy sports, the NFL occupies an even more lucrative position than the other major sports leagues (MLB, NBA, NHL, PGA and NASCAR.) While just about every fantasy sports league is owned operated by an independent third party, the NFL has its own fantasy league.

In fact, the NFL even collects royalties to the tune of more than $200 million in 2005 from those same independent companies for using NFL players’ names. No other league has this deal and the only reason that the NFL does is due to its notoriously weak Players’ Union which has relegated almost all control of players’ playing careers (and likenesses) to the NFL front office. At any rate, the NFL makes a lot of real money on fantasy football, not to mention the invisible benefits of attracting additional viewership of games by fantasy football players (thereby increasing ratings, thereby increasing ad prices, thereby increasing revenues.)

Enter Bill Frist. In 2006, Senator Bill Frist was the Senate Majority Leader and the major reason that the UIGEA got pushed through Congress while other less important bills (like health care reform) remained on the old Congressional back burner. But the UIGEA almost did not make it through so easily: that was accomplished under the guidance of NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and former Commissioner Paul Tagliabue.

Frist’s first plan to get the UIGEA through was to attach it to a bi-partisan troop funding bill designed to up the equipment levels of deployed US soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. What does making the processing of bets made in online gaming rooms illegal (which is what the UIGEA does) have to do with funding troops? Nothing, and respected Virginian Republican and Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John Warner voiced his “strong objection” to the inclusion of such a bill to both Frist himself and the Senate as a whole.

Meanwhile, the NFL had caught wind of the possible regulations and had hired Marty Gold (former counsel to none other than Bill Frist himself) to lobby Congress on their behalf. As an interesting side note, ever wonder why the NFL isn’t under the same type of scrutiny on the steroids issue as Major League Baseball is? After all, the top defensive player in the NFL (Shawn Merriman) was fined and suspended for steroid use while the major MLB culprit (Barry Bonds) has never been found guilty of taking anything. Not to mention the fact that NFL players are OBVIOUSLY on steroids (people don’t get that size and stay that strong and that fast naturally, it is just not in God’s plan.) I wonder if the $700,000 bill that Gold sent to the NFL for “services rendered on Capitol Hill in 2005” had anything to do with it?

Anyways, Gold (who has disavowed all knowledge of this) allegedly reported the situation to Goodell. Goodell then wrote a letter to Warner (a former Navy man and Marine himself) urging him to include the “achievement” that was the UIGEA in the aforementioned soldier funding bill. Warner refused again, but what we are interested in is Goodell’s “unsolicited” letter concerning internet gambling regulations. As it turns out, some time in between Warner’s two refusals, an interesting addendum was made to the UIGEA. That addition was the exclusion of fantasy sports as a form of “illegal internet gambling.”

Eventually, the UIGEA found its way to the back end of the Safe Port Act, which was designed to create a division of the Homeland Security Office to watch after sea ports. The UIGEA made it onto this bill without a vote by any negotiators at the very end of a long Congressional session. While the Bill’s author, House Homeland Security Chairman Rep. Pete King (R-NY) was not a proponent of the UIGEA, he needed the votes of Sen. Frist and the other Senators he would bring with him to pass through the piece of Homeland Security legislation. King said of the UIGEA:

“I’m not going to stop a bill because of Internet gambling… That was their final offer of the day.”

While I still don’t get why it was so important for Frist and friends to stop Internet gambling (maybe it really is a moral objection) it is pretty apparent how it got passed through Congress. And it is exceptionally apparent why horseracing and Fantasy Sports were declared exceptions to the law. As a rule, whenever you want to unearth cause on Capitol Hill, all you have to do is follow the money trail.